Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8) with ESMTP id 2459956 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:51:54 -0400 Received: from nc.rr.com (cpe-024-211-186-067.nc.rr.com [24.211.186.67]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h693jlpM026807 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 23:45:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F0B90B4.2040901@nc.rr.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:49:08 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] O2 Sensor Life with Lead Gasoline References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed Anderson wrote: > For those of you interested, I just replaced my O2 sensor after 114hours of > using 100LL gasoline. It lasted 114 hours of engine run time, however, the Would it be expected to last longer if 100LL is only used part of the time? Say for instance, only when it's not possible to obtain auto gas? -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------