Return-Path: Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8) with ESMTP id 2457557 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 15:10:19 -0400 Received: from user-2injr6s.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.236.220] helo=Carol) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19ZEtt-0005L6-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 12:10:17 -0700 Message-ID: <000701c343f2$337de0a0$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: First run approaches Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 14:10:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Hi, Rusty.....best of luck on first run of your rotary. I need to ask a question. I also have Dave Atkin's throttlebody and intake manifold, however I have the straight manifold rather than the wrap-around. I am interested in possibly using the wrap-around manifold like you have, but I am concerned with cowling clearance on top of the engine. My cowling just touches the top of the spin-on oil filter, and I need to move my alternator to the side, as it's origingal location is too tall for my cowling. Does your system stick up above the engine as high as the alternator? If it does, I might possibly cut the manifold on top after the bend, where it is horizontal, have an extension made and then weld the end back on that the throttlebody attaches to. Then it would be similar to Paul Lamar's manifold, except that I could still use the throttlebody that I got from Dave Atikins. I would like to stay with that system, as the electronic ignition harness is allready wired for those injectors, etc. The reason for these possible changes are because I am now considering the addition of a turbo, as an inconel muffler for a pusher would cost approximately what the turbo costs, but the turbo would increase power, where the expensive muffler will not. With my present setup, I could not mount a turbo, as the intake manifold comes straight out from the engine. Comments or suggestions? I forgot which turbo you are using? Thank you for your input and suggestions. Paul Conner, Mobile, AL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:02 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: First run approaches Thanks for the additional comments. I really don't expect the initial run to be too much of a problem, and I do plan to let the engine come up to normal operating temp as long as all is well, and I can top off the water as it runs. I'm using an aftermarket RX-7 AST (air separator tank), with the vent coming from the outlet on top of the engine on the flywheel end. Should work OK. Cheers, Rusty >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html