X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: \eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 868189 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:57:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.64; envelope-from=kenpowell@comcast.net Received: from 204.127.205.142 (unknown[204.127.205.159](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005041323570201600apon8e>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:02 +0000 Received: from [68.51.45.41] by 204.127.205.142; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:01 +0000 From: kenpowell@comcast.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Rotor Weight Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:01 +0000 Message-Id: <041320052357.25810.425DB1CD000501E0000064D2220700320104040A99019F020A05@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VucG93ZWxsQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25810_1113436621_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25810_1113436621_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ed and Bobby, I await your findings with much interest. I posted some references just a couple of weeks ago (magazine articles) that stated the RX8 rotors are 10% (or was it 11%???) lighter than the 9.7 rotors; this would make the weight 8.2 lbs. We'll see!!! (headed to FunNSun tommorrow with Charlie England) Ken Powell Bryant, Arkansas 501-847-4721 -------------- Original message -------------- Thanks, Bobby I would appreciate that. From some reports it sounds like they and the 9.7:1 may weigh the same in which case I already have the right counterweights. I'm not going anywhere, so take your time {:>) Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Bobby J. Hughes To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:26 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Renesis Rotor Weight Ed, I have my Renesis apart and will weigh the rotors on a postage scale early next week. I am out of town until then. They have been ceramic coated but that should not add much weight. Glad you made it down safe. Bobby Hughes --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25810_1113436621_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ed and Bobby,

I await your findings with much interest. I posted some references just a couple of weeks ago (magazine articles) that stated the RX8 rotors are 10% (or was it 11%???) lighter than the 9.7 rotors; this would make the weight 8.2 lbs. We'll see!!!

(headed to FunNSun tommorrow with Charlie England)
Ken Powell
Bryant, Arkansas
501-847-4721

-------------- Original message --------------

Thanks, Bobby

I would appreciate that. From some reports it sounds like they and the 9.7:1 may weigh the same in which case I already have the right counterweights. I'm not going anywhere, so take your time {:>)

Ed

----- Original Message -----

From: Bobby J. Hughes

To: Rotary motors in aircraft

Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:26 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Renesis Rotor Weight

Ed,

I have my Renesis apart and will weigh the rotors on a postage scale early next week. I am out of town until then. They have been ceramic coated but that should not add much weight.

Glad you made it down safe.

Bobby Hughes

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25810_1113436621_0--