X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: #\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.19\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.206] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 867564 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:07:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.206; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38.7.) id q.7b.4325d947 (16930) for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:06:49 -0400 (EDT) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: <7b.4325d947.2f8e8f89@aol.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:06:49 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rx-8 Rotors in Rx-7 Block To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1113404809" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5012 -------------------------------1113404809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George, I have found that you can be wrong about a great many things you think you understand completely! I do think we have a solid idea on this one however. Bill Jepson (The dazed and confused guy in the corner) Bill that's two of us and your the Engineer - could we both be wrong !? George (down under) With all of the above said: We have YET to attain even the SAME horsepower on the dyno as we are getting from our race engine(s) using the 89-91 non-turbo rotors !!! I have one question about this set up. Is the depression in the RX-8 rotor symmetrical about the centerline? If they run the rotors "backward" to change the side taper cutout and the depression isn't symmetrical they have changed the in and out taper and the combustion chamber shape/timing. Bill Jepson -------------------------------1113404809 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
George, I have found that you can be wrong about a great many things yo= u=20 think you understand completely! I do think we have a solid idea on this one= =20 however.
 
Bill Jepson (The dazed and confused guy in the corner)
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>
Bill that's two of us and your the Engineer -=20= could=20 we both be wrong !?
George  (down=20 under)
 
With all of the above said: We have YET to att= ain=20 even the SAME horsepower on the dyno as we are getting from our race=20 engine(s) using the 89-91 non-turbo rotors !!!
I have one question about this set up. Is the depression in the RX-= 8=20 rotor symmetrical about the centerline? If they run the rotors=20 "backward"  to change the side taper cutout and the depression isn'= t=20 symmetrical they have changed the in and out taper and the combustion=20 chamber shape/timing.
Bill Jepson
 
-------------------------------1113404809--