X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 866958 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:35:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.161.171] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLUuU-0001C7-Qp for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:35:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=sLm7ILUcWNihFGSGk15N4UyH/d/JU+Kvz6J+pKdVfTvPGTB02wIHe8P0KwyrqtSd; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:36:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ram and Alt air Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7978adf898b6a51991b1e8f8bf7ede4415350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.161.171 I have not actually studied the ideal ram scoop opening. I know that Tracy is using a 3inch dia round scoop that would have about 7 inches of area, just a little smaller than the scoop I proposed. I want to keep the scoop as low as possible while retaining the performance. The snouts that stick up into the air are not the look I want. Does the scoop get smaller with a higher top end? What would it be for 240 mph? Jerry On Tuesday, April 12, 2005, at 06:19 PM, Al Gietzen wrote: > > Here is pic of the plenum (at this point a piece of 1/4 inch ply. The > ram air scoop will be 4 inches wide and two inches high. > > Jerry: > > Is the 2" x 4" the opening size? I think that is more than double the > area > that would give the amount of ram air needed for a 2-rotor at, say, > 120 kts. > So it will be spilling air and likely cause some amount of unwanted > drag. > Ideally, a ram induction scoop is close to the area needed for near top > speed; and have radius on the entrance lip (about that of your index > finger) > to minimize entrance loss when you are at low speed. > > FWIW, I have no idea it any of this matters for what you're doing. > > Al > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >