Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <425C58F3.2010600@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:25:39 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Air Cleaners-Screens
References: <list-866903@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-866903@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Al Gietzen wrote:

>
> Hard to imagine where I could run into such a density of bugs; 
> however, if I have a theory that they would not get in the intake. The 
> scoop is located behind the maximum diameter of the fuselage. The bugs 
> (that didn’t get smashed) would be accelerated outward away from the 
> fuselage as the plane passed by, and because of their greater momentum 
> (than the air), would not come back toward the surface sufficiently to 
> enter the scoop as the fuselage converges.
>
> OK; at least that’s the theory. I can only find out by putting the 
> plane in a wind tunnel and releasing a swarm of bees J.
>
> Oh; BTW Jerry, the air here in coastal CA where the prevailing breeze 
> is off the ocean has very little dust. And the Velocity will never (I 
> hope) take off from a dirt strip.
>
> Al
>
Al, I've got a buddy with a Quickie that uses that theory for an "air 
cleaner". The air comes in and is pushed around and radius with the 
intake on the inside. Heavy stuff get thrown toward the outside that 
through a slot. The engine sucks on the clean inside air.

-- 
This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against
instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make
mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their
decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."