X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 866651 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:35:34 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.161.171] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLS5x-0000ge-T1 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:34:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=bSVGOOcv8oNlSNus6Y0FY8aJdmVK0WaZ+X6wOr/SM5syCEOFT3cVmmpZX3RaaAQc; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:36:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Air Cleaners-Screens (was Re: Latest on the Motor Trouble Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-40--260488719 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <87769A9E-AB92-11D9-A355-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec798d2740c6c3d52e2ee9deeeb1347cfdd9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.161.171 --Apple-Mail-40--260488719 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Jim, I am advocating ram air with no filter and also, as an alternate=20= source, filtered air from under the cowl. Bugs would have a hard time=20= messing up either one. Jerry On Tuesday, April 12, 2005, at 03:21 PM, James Maher wrote: > One situation that I can think of, that is very likely to occur would=20= > be flying into a swarm of bugs. Even a coarse screen such as Al has=20 > installed could > easily become clogged with dead bugs choking off all intake air and=20 > causing the engine to stop running. That swarm of bugs without the=20 > screen would in all likelyhood be ingested and spit out through the=20 > exhaust without so much as a hiccup by the engine. Just playing devils=20= > advocate. :o) > Jim > > Jerry Hey wrote: > > snip > > This is kind of a weird > topic to me as I can't think of any reason to not protect the engine > with a filter. > > =A0snip > --Apple-Mail-40--260488719 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jim, I am advocating ram air with no filter and also, as an alternate source, filtered air from under the cowl. Bugs would have a hard time messing up either one. Jerry=20 On Tuesday, April 12, 2005, at 03:21 PM, James Maher wrote: One situation that I can think of, that is very likely to occur would be flying into a swarm of bugs. Even a coarse screen such as Al has installed could easily become clogged with dead bugs choking off all intake air and causing the engine to stop running. That swarm of bugs without the screen would in all likelyhood be ingested and spit out through the exhaust without so much as a hiccup by the engine. Just playing devils advocate. :o) Jim Jerry Hey < wrote: snip This is kind of a weird topic to me as I can't think of any reason to not protect the engine with a filter. =A0snip = --Apple-Mail-40--260488719--