X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 866484 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:11:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050412191024.NHDC2054.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:10:24 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Air Cleaners-Screens (was Re: Latest on the Motor Trouble Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c53f93$26968bf0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C53F69.3DC2CDE0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C53F69.3DC2CDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is kind of a weird topic to me as I can't think of any reason to not protect the engine with a filter. That damn Tracy is just steering us all wrong again :-) I think everyone would like to have their engine protected by a filter, but not everyone has room for one, and not everyone thinks it's worth the performance penalty. I do worry a bit about picking up an odd piece of gravel, or something hard like that, but I'm not worried about dust and dirt. For the record, I actually worry more about taking a piece of FOD to the oil cooler or evap core. Cheers, Rusty (noting that it's way past noon Eastern time) ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C53F69.3DC2CDE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
This is kind of a weird topic to me as I can't think of any reason = to not=20 protect the engine with a filter.  
 
That damn=20 Tracy is just steering us all wrong again=20 :-)   
 
I think=20 everyone would like to have their engine protected by a filter, but = not=20 everyone has room for one, and not everyone thinks it's worth the = performance=20 penalty.  I do worry a bit about picking up an odd piece of gravel, = or=20 something hard like that, but I'm not worried about dust and dirt.  = For the=20 record, I actually worry more about taking a piece of FOD to the = oil cooler=20 or evap core.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty (noting=20 that it's way past noon Eastern=20 time) 
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C53F69.3DC2CDE0--