Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #20085
From: Paul <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:00:56 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi, Jim....yes, matter of fact the guy in the hangar across from me is building a Velocity and offered his under wing intakes for me to use. I would prefer the low drag NACA over the male scoops. However, nothing is in concrete.  Will know more after test flying it with the NACA duct. It is a fairly large duct, with a 3 inch outlet, so I think I will get enough air to the throttlebody.  Will know soon. Thanks for the info, however.  Paul Conner

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sower" <canarder@frontiernet.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:51 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again


Paul,
Have you looked at the Velocity under-wing intakes?  Sounds like just what you want ... Jim S.

sqpilot@bellsouth.net wrote:

Hi, Rusty....I just checked out Tracy's website and his discussion regarding the scat hose.It looks like he had a pretty long hose running from the intake manifold, behind the engine, then back towards the nose of the aircraft, My application will be a short hose (approximately 10 inches) traveling away from the engine into the wing root and NACA duct. I'm going to give it a try. I can always replace it with a fiberglass tube if necessary.  Thanks for the input.  Paul Conner

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Russell Duffy <mailto:13brv3@bellsouth.net>
    *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft <mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
    *Sent:* Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:40 PM
    *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again

    Hi, Tracy....thanks for the heads up....any more info would be
    appreciated....was it a long scat tube, and was it 3 inch
    diameter?  I assume you could not ingest enough air?  Thanks for
    any more info you can provide.  Paul Conner I recall Tracy saying that there was an almost unbelievable
    increase in air temp when using the scat/sceet/whatever hose.  I'm
    still using such a hose, and eventually will get around to putting
    temp sensors in each end.  It might be just as easy to make a new
    fiberglass (ack, gasp, cough) tube instead.  I think breaking in
    the engine will gain more power than that for me now though.  Cheers,
    Rusty


 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


-- No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date: 4/7/2005




Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster