X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 865657 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:01:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from paul52u7f5qyav ([209.214.44.123]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with SMTP id <20050412020101.RXIC2068.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@paul52u7f5qyav> for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:01:01 -0400 Message-ID: <004101c53f03$780b85c0$e52dd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:00:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Hi, Jim....yes, matter of fact the guy in the hangar across from me is building a Velocity and offered his under wing intakes for me to use. I would prefer the low drag NACA over the male scoops. However, nothing is in concrete. Will know more after test flying it with the NACA duct. It is a fairly large duct, with a 3 inch outlet, so I think I will get enough air to the throttlebody. Will know soon. Thanks for the info, however. Paul Conner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sower" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:51 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again > Paul, > Have you looked at the Velocity under-wing intakes? Sounds like just what > you want ... Jim S. > > sqpilot@bellsouth.net wrote: > >> Hi, Rusty....I just checked out Tracy's website and his discussion >> regarding the scat hose.It looks like he had a pretty long hose running >> from the intake manifold, behind the engine, then back towards the nose >> of the aircraft, My application will be a short hose (approximately 10 >> inches) traveling away from the engine into the wing root and NACA duct. >> I'm going to give it a try. I can always replace it with a fiberglass >> tube if necessary. Thanks for the input. Paul Conner >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Russell Duffy >> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft >> *Sent:* Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:40 PM >> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again >> >> Hi, Tracy....thanks for the heads up....any more info would be >> appreciated....was it a long scat tube, and was it 3 inch >> diameter? I assume you could not ingest enough air? Thanks for >> any more info you can provide. Paul Conner I recall Tracy saying >> that there was an almost unbelievable >> increase in air temp when using the scat/sceet/whatever hose. I'm >> still using such a hose, and eventually will get around to putting >> temp sensors in each end. It might be just as easy to make a new >> fiberglass (ack, gasp, cough) tube instead. I think breaking in >> the engine will gain more power than that for me now though. Cheers, >> Rusty >> > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date: 4/7/2005 > >