Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.170] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 820079 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:53:42 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.170; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Another rotary airplane now flying Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:52:56 -0600 Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69EC08100@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Another rotary airplane now flying Thread-Index: AcUxR8sHKDr6widKQwaZHm0YbcU1JQAAmeiQ From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Way to go Bernie!!! You da man! Mark S. Subject: [FlyRotary] Another rotary airplane now flying > > RV9A made a short circuit around the patch to day. Tom Hahn flew it since=20 > I had not realized that I needed a CFI endorsement for my insurance to > activate. He has flown most of the local RV's on first flight. He had run=20 > the airplane at high power 3 times the length of the field (4000 feet of=20 > soft turf) and the coolant temp was very hot when he took off. Oil temps=20 > were good. > > He saw an indicated coolant temp of 249, but no coolant appeared to blow=20 > out of the system. Talked to Tracy and he said there were 2 different=20 > sensors and maybe I was cal'd wrong. We checked it and the cal was=20 > correct. It did not seem that hot when we taxied in and snatched the top=20 > cowl off. > > Scratching head on next step, but the airplane flew great! > > Bernie