Return-Path: Received: from web81007.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.152] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with SMTP id 820032 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:03:49 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.37.152; envelope-from=deltaflyer@prodigy.net Message-ID: <20050325140303.20298.qmail@web81007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [199.231.49.128] by web81007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:03:03 PST Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:03:03 -0800 (PST) From: James Maher Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bad Day Good Day Non-Rotary To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1829328865-1111759383=:38483" --0-1829328865-1111759383=:38483 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ken, That's what you say now, but once you no longer have to do it for a living it will seem like much more fun. Remember how much fun you had writing code before anyone started paying you for it? Many people I talk to ask me why I don't fly for hire, and the answer is simple. I don't want to take the fun out of it. As soon as you start doing something you love for money the love for it starts to wear off. Jim kenpowell@comcast.net wrote: snip I swear that when I retire I will never write another line of code. Ken Powell (some Arkies CAN read, write and code) Bryant, Arkansas 501-847-4721 -------------- Original message -------------- Ed, Welcome to my world. Well the part about the one line of code not the other aircraft stuff. Such is the life of a Software Engineer. I have always found the best way to improve code is to remove some. The more you remove the better it works. :o) Jim Ed Anderson wrote: snip Turns out I changed ONE line of code this morning before taking it out and had not bothered to check it on the laboratory pulse meter. I mean it was a very simple change {:>). It didn't work on it any better back at home than it did on the aircraft. But, it was a relief to know it was a simply code screw up. Eliminated that line of code and all is back working. So what started out to be a bad day (relatively speaking) ended up pretty nice. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com --0-1829328865-1111759383=:38483 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Ken,
That's what you say now, but once you no longer have to do it for a living it will seem like much more fun. Remember how much fun you had writing code before anyone started paying you for it? Many people I talk to ask me why I don't fly for hire, and the answer is simple. I don't want to take the fun out of it. As soon as you start doing something you love for money the love for it starts to wear off.
Jim

kenpowell@comcast.net wrote:
snip
  I swear that when I retire I will never write another line of code.

Ken Powell  (some Arkies CAN read, write and code)
Bryant, Arkansas
501-847-4721
 
-------------- Original message --------------
Ed,
Welcome to my world.
Well the part about the one line of code not the other aircraft stuff.
Such is the life of a Software Engineer.
I have always found the best way to improve code is to remove some.
The more you remove the better it works. :o)
Jim

Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
snip
 
Turns out I changed ONE line of code this morning before taking it out and had not bothered to check it on the laboratory pulse meter. I mean it was a very simple change {:>).   It didn't work on it any better back at home than it did on the aircraft.  But, it was a relief to know it was a simply code screw up.  Eliminated that line of code and all is back working.
 
So what started out to be a bad day (relatively speaking) ended up pretty nice.
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
--0-1829328865-1111759383=:38483--