Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 820013 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:49:25 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050325134840.WEJX2063.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:48:40 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Mezarie WP337 Water Pump and hose question Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:48:58 -0600 Message-ID: <001d01c53141$651298c0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01C5310F.1A7828C0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C5310F.1A7828C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Right on. It says re-scheduled. Too bad it didn't get here today. I = don't remember when it was originally scheduled, so is it early or late? I = should get it tested next week though. (Rusty sent me his Craig-Davies pump to measure on the same setup I used with the WP136's)=20 I do all the UPS shipping online, and the original estimate assumes the package will be in the hands of UPS the same day you print the label. = In this case, it got to UPS the next day, so they "reschedule" it. No = hurry on the test on my account, but I will be interested to see how it compares. I bought some Earl's Pro-Lite 350 hose from Summit. It is a nylon braid = and fits the Earl's reusable swivel ends. It's good to 300 psi and 350 F. = It's also a lot more flexible than the hoses I had made. Am I going to lose = much reliability by using this instead of the stainless steel braided hose? = The SS hose has a better pressure rating, but both are way over rated for = what I need. I never really looked at the pro-lite hose. From the description, I = figured it would be a lot cheaper than the perform-o-flex, but it actually looks more expensive. Being more flexible would a big plus, but I do like the stainless braid on hoses. =20 Cheers, Rusty=20 ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C5310F.1A7828C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Right on.  It says re-scheduled.  Too bad it = didn't=20 get here today.  I don't remember when it was originally scheduled, = so is=20 it early or late?  I should get it tested next week though.  = (Rusty=20 sent me his Craig-Davies pump to measure on the same setup I used with = the=20 WP136's) 

I do all = the UPS=20 shipping online, and the original estimate assumes the package will be = in the=20 hands of UPS the same day you print the label.  In this case, it = got to UPS=20 the next day, so they "reschedule" it.  No hurry on the test on my = account,=20 but I will be interested to see how it compares.

I bought some Earl's Pro-Lite 350 hose from Summit.  It is a = nylon braid=20 and fits the Earl's reusable swivel ends.  It's good to 300 psi and = 350=20 F.  It's also a lot more flexible than the hoses I had made.  = Am I=20 going to lose much reliability by using this instead of the stainless = steel=20 braided hose?  The SS hose has a better pressure rating, but both = are way=20 over rated for what I need.

I never=20 really looked at the pro-lite hose.  From the description, I = figured it=20 would be a lot cheaper than the perform-o-flex, but it actually looks = more=20 expensive.  Being more flexible would a big plus, but I do like the = stainless braid on hoses. 

Cheers,

Rusty =

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C5310F.1A7828C0--