Return-Path: Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 767359 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:50:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.214.45.223] by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050302224943.NJUE2296.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.214.45.223]> for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:49:43 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [266.5.2]); Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:49:37 -0600 Message-ID: <002a01c51f7a$16dadb00$df2dd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EWP showdown Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:49:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C51F47.CC0E5E80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C51F47.CC0E5E80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageHey, Rusty....thank you so much for doing this homework for me = (and others as well). I have been thinking about the EWP's a lot = recently, and it would appear that soon we will have more valuable = information, founded by real trial and error experimentation rather than = mathematical/theoretical guesswork. We appreciate the willingness to = experiment that you exhibit (and share the results). We all benefit from = your pioneering spirit. Paul Conner ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:21 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] EWP showdown Greetings, Well, I've still been trying to figure out how I could get two EWP's = in the RV-3, and took another look at the Meziere WP136. It seems = pretty comparable to the Davies Craig unit as far as specs, but there = are some advantages/disadvantages to each. Primarily, the Davies Craig = is much lighter, but the WP136 has threaded fittings. I also like the = inline orientation of the in/out fittings on the WP136, which might = allow me to fit two of them on my firewall.=20 All the pictures and measurements in the world can't answer the = fitment question as well as having one of these in my hand, so I ordered = a WP136 from Summit today (should arrive Friday). I'll take it to the = hanger this weekend, and see how it fits. =20 I can also imagine a number of mad scientist experiments, including = temporarily hooking the WP136 in series with the flow meter (arriving = later today) in my system on the plane. This would give me 3 pumps in = series, along with a flowmeter. I can also play with each pump and the = flowmeter using a bucket of water, and my spare evap core. =20 Rusty (fun stuff that I don't have time for) =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005 ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C51F47.CC0E5E80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hey, Rusty....thank you so much for = doing this=20 homework for me (and others as well). I have been thinking about the = EWP's a lot=20 recently, and it would appear that soon we will have more valuable=20 information, founded by real trial and error experimentation rather than = mathematical/theoretical guesswork. We appreciate the willingness to = experiment=20 that you exhibit (and share the results). We all benefit from your = pioneering=20 spirit.  Paul Conner
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 = 1:21=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] EWP = showdown

Greetings,
 
Well, I've = still been=20 trying to figure out how I could get two EWP's in the RV-3, and took = another=20 look at the Meziere WP136.  It seems pretty comparable to the = Davies=20 Craig unit as far as specs, but there are some = advantages/disadvantages to=20 each.   Primarily, the Davies Craig is much lighter, but the = WP136=20 has threaded fittings.  I also like the inline orientation of the = in/out=20 fittings on the WP136, which might allow me to fit two of them on my=20 firewall. 
 
All the = pictures and=20 measurements in the world can't answer the fitment question as=20 well as having one of these in my hand, so I ordered a WP136 from = Summit=20 today (should arrive Friday).  I'll take it to the hanger this = weekend,=20 and see how it fits. 
 
I can also = imagine a=20 number of mad scientist experiments, = including temporarily hooking=20 the WP136 in series with the flow meter (arriving later today) in = my=20 system on the plane.  This would give me 3 pumps in = series,=20 along with a flowmeter.   I can also play with each pump and = the=20 flowmeter using a bucket of water, and my spare evap core. =20
 
Rusty (fun = stuff that I=20 don't have time for) 
 
 
 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG=20 Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release = Date:=20 2/28/2005
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C51F47.CC0E5E80--