Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 767268 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:23:26 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j22MMckd002324 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:22:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000b01c51f76$58a864c0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] fuel cutoff valve necessary? Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:22:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Ernest, I could be wrong, but seems I recall somewhere that FAA requires a fuel shut off valve. Someone else may know whether that is correct or not. For the reason you stated - Safety. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 4:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] fuel cutoff valve necessary? > This really doesn't apply to planes with multiple tanks, as the fuel > shutoff generally does double duty as a selector. But I have only one > tank, so the cutoff valve is really only useful in case of an engine > fire or in preperation of an emergency landing. > > With a fuel pump that blocks flow when it isn't running, what useful > purpose does the cutoff valve serve beyond increasing pilot workload? > Won't cutting power to the fuel pump provide the same service and > eliminate several failure modes? > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >