Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 766974 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:48:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2005 15:01:03 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,130,1107752400"; d="scan'208"; a="39024205:sNHT991676428" Received: from [172.18.179.180] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.180]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j22Jju1j004206 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:45:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <422617F4.7020800@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:45:56 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EWP showdown References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Russell Duffy wrote: > Greetings, > > Well, I've still been trying to figure out how I could get two EWP's > in the RV-3, and took another look at the Meziere WP136. It seems > pretty comparable to the Davies Craig unit as far as specs, but there > are some advantages/disadvantages to each. Primarily, the Davies > Craig is much lighter, but the WP136 has threaded fittings. I also > like the inline orientation of the in/out fittings on the WP136, which > might allow me to fit two of them on my firewall. > BTW, I'd really like to know how the WP136 performs compared to the Davies-Craig unit. I've had my eye on using two of those in paralell. From looking at the data sheet, they flow a little less, but in cruise or alternator out emergency I could possibly shut one down. I look forward to seeing the results of your tests.