Return-Path: Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 765354 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:02:50 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.214.44.217] by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050301210202.OYIL2072.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.214.44.217]> for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:02:02 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [266.5.2]); Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:01:57 -0600 Message-ID: <00e501c51ea1$e496e770$0a2cd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: checking and cleaning injectors Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:01:22 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-4224D846273F=======" --=======AVGMAIL-4224D846273F======= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C51E6F.87EFF3E0" ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C51E6F.87EFF3E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Many thanks to everyone who replied and offered injector tesing and = cleaning methods. I did a Google search, and also came up with a site = that suggested measuring the ohm resistance between the two pins on a = known working injector, then comparing that reading with the ohm = measurement on the suspect injector. Makes sense. I just went ahead and = ordered a new injector. I don't mind spending money on "need to have = working" items like injectors, spark plugs, alternators, etc. I will = sleep better with a new injector versus a reconditioned one that has = already failed once. I realize that one that has been cleaned and flow = tested might be reliable, but I kinda like the thought of a new one. = Paul Conner ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C51E6F.87EFF3E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Many thanks to everyone who replied and = offered=20 injector tesing and cleaning methods. I did a Google search, and also = came up=20 with a site that suggested measuring the ohm resistance between the two = pins=20 on a known working injector, then comparing that reading with the = ohm=20 measurement on the suspect injector. Makes sense. I just went = ahead and=20 ordered a new injector. I don't mind spending money on "need to have = working"=20 items like injectors, spark plugs, alternators, etc. I will sleep = better=20 with a new injector versus a reconditioned one that has already failed = once. I=20 realize that one that has been cleaned and flow tested might be = reliable, but I=20 kinda like the thought of a new one. Paul Conner

------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C51E6F.87EFF3E0-- --=======AVGMAIL-4224D846273F======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-4224D846273F=======--