Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 764389 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:11:15 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2005 09:25:20 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,127,1107752400"; d="scan'208"; a="38821234:sNHT18188896" Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j21EAR1j013306 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:10:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <422477D3.5020909@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:10:27 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [FlyRotary]actual water flow was Belt rumnations; soliciting Opinions of racers please.... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Russell Duffy wrote: > I can't wait to see what the EWP flows, but I'm not sure what I'll do > with that info. > > Rusty Theoretically (sorry, Leon), you need 20GPM to cool the engine if you have a 30degree drop across the radiators. Is that right, Al? Didn't you have temperature probes on both sides of your radiators, Rusty? Knowing the flow rate, whether by direct measurement or with table lookup, you will have completely characterized your cooling system. You will have the definitive answers to all the questions of whether it will work or not.