|
<... switched reluctance integrated starter/alternator ...>
What might that be? How might one work? I've flown turbines with
starter/generators, and they were an abomination.
I've no idea what a starter/alternator would look like or how big/heavy
it would be ... Jim S.
Fred Osborn wrote:
Sorry, I forgot
to change the subject when I sent this before so most guys just passed
it by. FWIW.
>Richard Sohn wrote:
>We should not overlook the disadvantage of PM alternators. At
higher operating speed,
>the not used output will have to be dissipated. This is the main
reason why automotive
>alternators are regulated by the excitation system.
Another disadvantage of PM devices is the hystersis losses in the
stator laminations.
At 6000 rpm continuous you could end up with a very warm stator.
Actually, the ultimate
answer to all this will probably be a switched reluctance integrated
starter/alternator.
Used with an EWP - no belts at all.
Fred Osborn
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|