Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17892
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] PM Alternators Disadvantages
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:42:57 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
<... switched reluctance integrated starter/alternator ...>
What might that be?  How might one work?  I've flown turbines with starter/generators, and they were an abomination. 
I've no idea what a starter/alternator would look like or how big/heavy it would be ... Jim S.

Fred Osborn wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to change the subject when I sent this before so most guys just passed
it by. FWIW.

>Richard Sohn wrote:

>We should not overlook the disadvantage of PM alternators. At higher operating speed,
>the not used output will have to be dissipated. This is the main reason why automotive
>alternators are regulated by the excitation system.

Another disadvantage of PM devices is the hystersis losses in the stator laminations.
At 6000 rpm continuous you could end up with a very warm stator. Actually, the ultimate
answer to all this will probably be a switched reluctance integrated starter/alternator.
Used with an EWP - no belts at all.

Fred Osborn




 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster