Return-Path: Received: from syd-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.104.193.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 758117 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:52:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.104.193.196; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from syd-core-1.cisco.com (64.104.193.198) by syd-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2005 10:04:08 +1100 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by syd-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1OMpNJK023667 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:51:25 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <421E5A81.2010403@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:51:45 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George Lendich wrote: >>The bigger issue is clearance. With the two units and EWP, >>I won't need a belt. >>Ernest, I have always wondered about the EWP. While I'm not a Lamar >> >> >reactionary, I would like to know if anybody is NOW FLYING with an EWP as >their primary water pump. This is not intended to start an arguement, it's >just a question. > > >>Bill Jepson >> >> > >Bill, >Good question, you must be reading my mind ! >George (down under) > > > Yes. Todd Batrim (who would be 'up over'?). Some question remains that he may be getting a pass due to colder climate, but for a variety of reasons, most notably W&B, I'm betting the farm that it'll work in Lady Caroline's northern lands, here in the US of A.