Return-Path: Received: from mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP-TLS id 757990 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:56:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.196; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-8-215.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.8.215]) by mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j1OLtmRQ026571 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:55:49 +1100 Message-ID: <006601c51abb$f2953b40$d708ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:58:17 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > The bigger issue is clearance. With the two units and EWP, > I won't need a belt. > Ernest, I have always wondered about the EWP. While I'm not a Lamar reactionary, I would like to know if anybody is NOW FLYING with an EWP as their primary water pump. This is not intended to start an arguement, it's just a question. > Bill Jepson Bill, Good question, you must be reading my mind ! George (down under)