Return-Path: Received: from imo-m18.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 757887 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:04:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.208; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.60.4fff7d2d (15886) for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:03:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from aol.com (mow-d21.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.162]) by air-id08.mx.aol.com (v104.18) with ESMTP id MAILINID81-3e0e421e33072ac; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:03:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:03:19 -0500 From: WRJJRS@aol.com To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net ("Rotary motors in aircraft") Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Racemate alt/water pump MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4871B36B.0D7D63B0.00051B7E@aol.com> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 X-AOL-IP: 66.127.99.234 X-AOL-Language: english Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit My premise may be way off, but isn't the open lead output voltage linear with RPM? So my thinking goes, if you get charging voltage at idle of 1000, it will be 6 times higher (over 70V) at a cruise RPM of 6000. The Yellow Daisy it is! You are correct in your assumption that the POTENTIAL output increases with RPM but it isn't really linear. Something to do with internal coil hysteresis or histowhatsit. The coils/magnets deal with both sides of the sine wave in modern alternators. I won't get myself any deeper, I'm a MECHANICAL engineer, don't have the full sparky thing in the memory bank. Bill