Return-Path: Received: from tomcat.al.noaa.gov ([140.172.240.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 757672 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:52 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=140.172.240.2; envelope-from=bdube@al.noaa.gov Received: from PILEUS.al.noaa.gov (pileus.al.noaa.gov [140.172.241.195]) by tomcat.al.noaa.gov (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id j1OIW7sX027246 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:32:07 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20050224113053.05882008@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov> X-Sender: bdube@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:31:50 -0700 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Bill Dube Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

I'm still not all that crazy about having dual alternators. I'd like to see the e-shaft alt putting out enough for primary duty, and perhaps it can, particularly if they can "stack" them.

Dual alternators on an EFI EI engine is just like dual mags on a Lyc.