Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=140.172.240.2; envelope-from=bdube@al.noaa.gov
Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20050224111522.01b6ebc0@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:15:56 -0700
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
From: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator
In-Reply-To: <list-757009@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Pulley free would be nice, if possible.

At 10:33 PM 2/23/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Bill;
>         I was about to ask you to clarify what they are proposing to 
> build when
>your latest reply to Paul has shed some light on it.
>         Just to confirm this... We are talking about a non-belt driven PM
>alternator only without a water pump, with the stator mounted directly to
>our existing front cover, via some sort of adapter (or a cu$tom front
>cover?) and the rotor would take the place of the existing pulley mounted on
>the e-shaft, and have the outer surface of the rotor machined as a
>pulley/belt drive for a main alt. (or water pump for you non-EWP types)
>         Does this sound about right? If that's the case I'm in as long as 
> they
>don't want an arm & leg for it. I'm hoping for a serpentine as I already
>converted my existing pulley for the alt.
>         Now if we can get this with a high enough output to eliminate the 
> main,
>then get Ernest to develop a back-up motorcycle alt for the PSRU, then I
>could be pulley free!
>
>Good work
>
>Todd Bartrim
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html