Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.169.52] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 757588 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:10:45 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.169.52; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:10:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 4.174.1.155 by BAY3-DAV22.phx.gbl with DAV; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:09:06 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [4.174.1.155] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:09:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01C51A72.03BF4DB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.10.0011.1703 Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:09:04 -0500 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2005 18:10:00.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E15FEB0:01C51A9C] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C51A72.03BF4DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor LockWas that an EFI with return or a non = return carbureted system. Makes a difference. Tracy Hi, Tracy...I had the same setup on my LongEZ....two strake fuel = tanks and a fuel selector valve with left, right and both. 95% of the = time, I just used both. Worked fine. Fuel levels in both tanks were = always very close to each other. Paul Conner I agree, it's a tough call on the Facet pump with the sump tank. = But then if you eliminated the sump tank....... : )=20 Your Andair valve is a good (but pricey) solution. And I see the = fuel transfer requirement as no more onerous than the requirement to = switch tanks. This is a cherries & nectarines issue. Both taste great. I'll have to think about that "auto leveling" a bit but at first = blush, I'm not sure it would work in all situations. Have you tried it? Tracy Message cut by Paul Conner No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005 >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C51A72.03BF4DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock
Was that an EFI with return or a non return carbureted = system.  Makes=20 a difference.
 
Tracy
 
Hi, Tracy...I had the same setup on = my=20 LongEZ....two strake fuel tanks and a fuel selector valve with left, = right=20 and both. 95% of the time, I just used both. Worked fine. Fuel = levels in=20 both tanks were always very close to each other.  Paul = Conner
 

I agree, it's a tough call on the Facet pump with the sump = tank. =20 But then if you eliminated the sump tank.......  : = ) 
 Your Andair valve is a good (but pricey) solution. =20  And I see the fuel transfer requirement as no more = onerous than=20 the requirement to switch tanks.  This is a cherries & = nectarines=20 issue.  Both taste great.
 
I'll have to think about that "auto leveling" a bit but at = first blush,=20 I'm not sure it would work in all situations.  Have you tried = it?
 
Tracy
 
Message cut by Paul Conner
 No virus = found in this=20 outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / = Virus=20 Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005
>>  = Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:  =20 = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
= ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C51A72.03BF4DB0--