Yes you're right Bob, your statement that 'all the displacement gets used during one rev of the rotors is the same as what Ed was saying. I didn't carefully follow Ed's very last fix that put that in.
On your post I wasn't sure what the point being interjected was and what is supporting discussion. Was the point: "Displacement doesn't have anything to do with RPM, it's just how much does the engine displace!" and do you think that disagrees with what Ed was saying? Or were you even disagreeing at all?
Tom
Bob White <bob@bob-white.com> wrote:
Hi Tom,
As I say, my comment isn't directed at the calculations at all. There
has been much discussion about what the displacement is, and how much of
the rotation to count. Mazda claiming 1.3 L for example.
I stand by my statement about the displacement. That seems to be
exactly the way Ed has used it.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' |