Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.211.128.10; envelope-from=JoeH@PilgrimTech.com
Reply-To: <joeh@pilgrimtech.com>
From: "Joe Hull" <JoeH@PilgrimTech.com>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Microtech EFI and Tuning 
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:51:05 -0800
Organization: Pilgrim Technologies
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <list-723109@logan.com>
thread-index: AcUPIQrVoGqgQEUHT76E8BRM4L7pZgAbxNQA
Message-Id: <20050210165106.375592C5B2A@incoming-standby.adhost.com>

Dale Rogers wrote:
>    It would appear that the way I wrote that seemed to
> suggest more than I intended.  It wasn't my intention to
> imply that Tracy's unit wasn't being successfully used -
> only to compare its numbers against the smaller number of
> flying MicroTech units.

I'm not sure I would assume there are a smaller number of MicroTech
units.  Atkins has been selling engine packages a long, long time and
has been selling MicroTech units with a lot of them. 

Atkins himself has been flying with his own MicroTech unit for years.
It could very well be that there are more MicroTech units flying than
EC2's. 

Just another data point.

Joe Hull
Bellevue (Seattle), Washington
Cozy MkIV #991 (working on Engine & Electrical & Finishing)
http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/JoeHull/index.html