Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 723179 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:04:45 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.54.3d9d825f (17526) for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:03:56 -0500 (EST) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: <54.3d9d825f.2f3c534c@aol.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:03:56 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1108015436" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5005 -------------------------------1108015436 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:19:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, jerryhey@earthlink.net writes: I don't like divided runners and tuning the intake would be impossible. Why not use two throttle bodies? It is the most simple, straight forward intake possible. Jerry Very straightforward thinking Jerry. You can use a single throttle body, but it must be large, and upstream of a large plenum to allow the air to enter the bellmouth with the least turbulence. One throttle per tube is much easier for PP. Stick with what you have! The only way to improve on that is slide throttles. They would also be 1 per tube. I have a design I want to run by you and Ed. I think it would be perfect for your PP engine. Bill Jepson -------------------------------1108015436 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:19:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 jerryhey@earthlink.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I don't=20 like divided runners and tuning the intake would be impossible.
 = Why=20 not use two throttle bodies?  It is the most simple, straight
for= ward=20 intake possible.  Jerry
Very straightforward thinking Jerry. You can use a single throttle body= ,=20 but it must be large, and upstream of a large plenum to allow the air to ent= er=20 the bellmouth with the least turbulence. One throttle per tube is much easie= r=20 for PP. Stick with what you have! The only way to improve on that is slide=20 throttles. They would also be 1 per tube. I have a design I want to run by y= ou=20 and Ed. I think it would be perfect for your PP engine.
Bill Jepson
-------------------------------1108015436--