Return-Path: Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net ([204.127.203.211] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 722774 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:29:44 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.203.211; envelope-from=btilley@mchsi.com Received: from [192.168.1.101] (12-218-75-244.client.mchsi.com[12.218.75.244]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20050209222859m9100ovklpe>; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:28:59 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-14-831918112 Message-Id: <1b70226e45d132265ab907de8b97c2ab@mchsi.com> From: Bob Tilley Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ellison, the missing piece Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:28:56 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) --Apple-Mail-14-831918112 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed All, I'm putting my base engine together this weekend. I will be going turbo or supercharged. And like Dale R. I hope to have 40 hrs on the engine prior to installing it. If someone has an old used manifold I could use I would be willing to test the system out, and do whatever is necessary to prove or disprove the theories. I can't tell you how much help you guys have been to me so far, & now it is time for me to start repaying. I love the idea of the Mazda 13b and it kins being used in planes. Bob Tilley Albany, Ga On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Bartrim, Todd wrote: > I don't remember correctly, but was Ken's advise to not use the > Ellison based on actual use? If so then maybe that provides the proof > needed and no further speculation is necessary, but if it was based on > theoretical analysis, then what we need to do is have someone with > their engine on a test bed install one with an acceptable manifold and > prove it one way or the other. --Apple-Mail-14-831918112 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=US-ASCII All, I'm putting my base engine together this weekend. I will be going turbo or supercharged. And like Dale R. I hope to have 40 hrs on the engine prior to installing it. If someone has an old used manifold I could use I would be willing to test the system out, and do whatever is necessary to prove or disprove the theories. I can't tell you how much help you guys have been to me so far, & now it is time for me to start repaying. I love the idea of the Mazda 13b and it kins being used in planes. Bob Tilley Albany, Ga On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Bartrim, Todd wrote: Arial0000,0000,FFFFI don't remember correctly, but was Ken's advise to not use the Ellison based on actual use? If so then maybe that provides the proof needed and no further speculation is necessary, but if it was based on theoretical analysis, then what we need to do is have someone with their engine on a test bed install one with an acceptable manifold and prove it one way or the other. --Apple-Mail-14-831918112--