Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.160.45] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b6)
  with HTTP id 2343821 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:21:04 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 321 SS thickness
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b6
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 16:21:04 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2343821@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <NEBBIFDPKMDNOGJHELANCECIDAAA.twjames@healed.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Tommy James" <twjames@healed.org>:

Sorry, Charlie,   I can't give a quality comparison, but the temps under
cowl seem to be okay.  Heat, after turning of the fire, is much more
obviously retained by the block and radiators than the headers.  The muffler
is also under the cowl.  It is only a guess, but I think the net effect is
very positive having the pipes coated, and well worth the money.
TJ