Return-Path: <Lehanover@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.205] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 617981 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:27:19 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.205; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com
Received: from Lehanover@aol.com
	by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.8d.1efcf47a (3940)
	 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:26:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Lehanover@aol.com
Message-ID: <8d.1efcf47a.2f247377@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:26:47 EST
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Dynos II (was Re: changed to Octane)
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138

In a message dated 1/22/2005 9:23:05 PM Central Standard Time, 
jackoford@theofficenet.com writes:

<< How's about adapting a flange-style u-joint to the output of the engine and
 running a driveshaft? 'Course the driveshaft might get launched spinning at
 9k or so, and so might the truck axle pinion and bearings. >>

Turning a drive shaft up to 10,000 RPM is how most dynos work anyway. Not a 
problem.


Lynn E. Hanover