Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 617847 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:50:40 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.30; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050122235009.XAJB21241.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:50:09 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Dynos II Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:50:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050122235009.XAJB21241.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Lynn Hanover < Lehanover@aol.com > wrote: > 4 hours on Pauls dyno with him doing the tuning is far more valuable > than unlimited time on a dyno where the operator has never seen > a rotary. I would expect to pay $1,500 a day for good help on a dyno. > $800.00 is a gift. Well - considering the original terms under discussion $800 might have been about "par", rather than a "gift". It didn't include "tuning" - other than maybe playing with the mixture - just verification: an engine run, with readings every 100 RPM, so I could chart the torque and hp curves of my "finished" engine. Anyway, it's a moot point, considering his current policy. Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254