Return-Path: Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 604486 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:44:35 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.66; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.214.44.42] by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050112124404.AOG2042.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.214.44.42]> for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:44:04 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.6.10]); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:43:56 -0600 From: "Paul" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: props again Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:43:47 -0600 Message-ID: <001101c4f8a4$5ee4bb70$2a2cd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-41E51B8C5526=======" --=======AVGMAIL-41E51B8C5526======= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4F872.144A4B70" ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4F872.144A4B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:29 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: props again Well, I installed my new prop today, hoping for higher rpm's. I mistakenly assumed that by installing a smaller diameter prop with less pitch, I would gain engine rpm's. Wrong. I am still stuck at 4800 rpm's, big prop or little prop. How different are the props supposed to be? Rusty (where's my pizza) The original prop was a 64 x 78. I replaced it with a 62 x 72, same manufacturer. Should take less power to swing it, which one would expect more rpm's? Paul Conner ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4F872.144A4B70 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

 

 

-----Original = Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent: = Tuesday, January 11, = 2005 10:29 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = props again

 

Well, I installed my new = prop today, hoping for higher rpm’s.  = I mistakenly assumed that by installing a smaller diameter prop with less = pitch, I would gain engine rpm’s.  Wrong.  I am still = stuck at 4800 rpm’s, big prop or little prop.   

 

How different are = the props supposed to be?

 

Rusty (where's my pizza) 

 

The original prop was a 64 x 78. =  I replaced it with a 62 x 72, = same manufacturer. Should take less power to swing it, which one would expect = more rpm’s?  Paul = Conner

 

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C4F872.144A4B70-- --=======AVGMAIL-41E51B8C5526======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-41E51B8C5526=======--