-------------- Original message --------------

> The billet one would be best, and the proices are the same. On the 9.7 rotor no!
> Its too light and too weak.
> In my feb. collum in RxTuner, I will be going over the rotor parts and
> differences for the years. With some
> of the weaknesses. I'm in progress on it right now and not ready for press. The
> ones that are ready right
> now are 9.1:1
> I can get different compression ratio's for you and thats not a problem.
> Thanks on the web site. I still have alot more to do, as time permits! And with
> the availability of a live
> computer!
> Smiles to everyone.
> Kathy Atkins
> AmericanRotaryEngine.com
> AtkinsRotary.com
> AtkinsRotaryMarine.com
> Camdensuperchargers.com
> AquaXtremes.com
> RxTuner.com
>
> -------Original Message-------
> > From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
> > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff
> > Sent: 06 Jan 2005 22:56:55
> >
> > Some are cast and some are billet, both are hardened 2x's. Depends on the use
> for which one is better
> for the application. Yes they use factory rotor oiling holes. Here is a picture
> for you.
> >
> > Kathy Atkins
> > Interesting. Thanks for the pics. So would I be correct in assuming that
> the billet shafts would be best
> for our application? Is the price the same for either? Finally, is that a new
> 9.7 cr rotor that's included in
> the balanced assembly?
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Rusty
> >
> > PS- The new web page is coming along nicely.
> -------Original Message-------
>
> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html