Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 603725 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:35:48 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.56; envelope-from=kenpowell@comcast.net Received: from 204.127.205.142 (unknown[204.127.205.161](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005011119351701200p2l05e>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:35:17 +0000 Received: from [166.102.160.133] by 204.127.205.142; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:35:16 +0000 From: kenpowell@comcast.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" , "kathy" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:35:16 +0000 Message-Id: <011120051935.22986.41E42A7300054DF8000059CA220588448404040A99019F020A05@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VucG93ZWxsQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22986_1105472116_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22986_1105472116_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Kathy, do you have the weight of the Renisis rotor? Ken Powell Bryant, Arkansas 501-847-4721 -------------- Original message -------------- > The billet one would be best, and the proices are the same. On the 9.7 rotor no! > Its too light and too weak. > In my feb. collum in RxTuner, I will be going over the rotor parts and > differences for the years. With some > of the weaknesses. I'm in progress on it right now and not ready for press. The > ones that are ready right > now are 9.1:1 > I can get different compression ratio's for you and thats not a problem. > Thanks on the web site. I still have alot more to do, as time permits! And with > the availability of a live > computer! > Smiles to everyone. > Kathy Atkins > AmericanRotaryEngine.com > AtkinsRotary.com > AtkinsRotaryMarine.com > Camdensuperchargers.com > AquaXtremes.com > RxTuner.com > > -------Original Message------- > > From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff > > Sent: 06 Jan 2005 22:56:55 > > > > Some are cast and some are billet, both are hardened 2x's. Depends on the use > for which one is better > for the application. Yes they use factory rotor oiling holes. Here is a picture > for you. > > > > Kathy Atkins > > Interesting. Thanks for the pics. So would I be correct in assuming that > the billet shafts would be best > for our application? Is the price the same for either? Finally, is that a new > 9.7 cr rotor that's included in > the balanced assembly? > > > > Thanks again, > > Rusty > > > > PS- The new web page is coming along nicely. > -------Original Message------- > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22986_1105472116_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Kathy, do you have the weight of the Renisis rotor?

Ken Powell
Bryant, Arkansas
501-847-4721

-------------- Original message --------------

> The billet one would be best, and the proices are the same. On the 9.7 rotor no!
> Its too light and too weak.
> In my feb. collum in RxTuner, I will be going over the rotor parts and
> differences for the years. With some
> of the weaknesses. I'm in progress on it right now and not ready for press. The
> ones that are ready right
> now are 9.1:1
> I can get different compression ratio's for you and thats not a problem.
> Thanks on the web site. I still have alot more to do, as time permits! And with
> the availability of a live
> computer!
> Smiles to everyone.
> Kathy Atkins
> AmericanRotaryEngine.com
> AtkinsRotary.com
> AtkinsRotaryMarine.com
> Camdensuperchargers.com
> AquaXtremes.com
> RxTuner.com
>
> -------Original Message-------
> > From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
> > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff
> > Sent: 06 Jan 2005 22:56:55
> >
> > Some are cast and some are billet, both are hardened 2x's. Depends on the use
> for which one is better
> for the application. Yes they use factory rotor oiling holes. Here is a picture
> for you.
> >
> > Kathy Atkins
> > Interesting. Thanks for the pics. So would I be correct in assuming that
> the billet shafts would be best
> for our application? Is the price the same for either? Finally, is that a new
> 9.7 cr rotor that's included in
> the balanced assembly?
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Rusty
> >
> > PS- The new web page is coming along nicely.
> -------Original Message-------
>
> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22986_1105472116_0--