Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.14.68.141; envelope-from=kathy@atkinsrotary.com
Message-ID: <20050111003944.25910.qmail@server290.com>
Reply-To: "kathy" <kathy@atkinsrotary.com>
From: "kathy" <kathy@atkinsrotary.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:39:44 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The billet one would be best, and the proices are the same. On the 9.7 rotor no! Its too light and too weak.
In my feb. collum in RxTuner, I will be going over the rotor parts and differences for the years. With some 
of the weaknesses. I'm in progress on it right now and not ready for press. The ones that are ready right 
now are 9.1:1
I can get different compression ratio's for you and thats not a problem. 
Thanks on the web site. I still have alot more to do, as time permits! And with the availability of a live 
computer!
Smiles to everyone.
Kathy Atkins
AmericanRotaryEngine.com
AtkinsRotary.com
AtkinsRotaryMarine.com
Camdensuperchargers.com
AquaXtremes.com
RxTuner.com

-------Original Message-------
> From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: single rotor stuff
> Sent: 06 Jan 2005 22:56:55
>
>  Some are cast and some are billet, both are hardened 2x's. Depends on the use for which one is better 
for the application. Yes they use factory rotor oiling holes. Here is a picture for you.
>  
>  Kathy Atkins
>  Interesting.  Thanks for the pics.  So would I be correct in assuming that the billet shafts would be best 
for our application?  Is the price the same for either?  Finally, is that a new 9.7 cr rotor that's included in 
the balanced assembly?
>  
>  Thanks again,
>  Rusty
>  
>  PS- The new web page is coming along nicely.
-------Original Message-------