Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account marv@lancaironline.net HELO marvkaye.lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1796403 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:24:52 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021002182240.044e9550@lancaironline.net> X-Sender: marvkaye@lancaironline.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:24:09 -0400 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net From: "Michael D. Callahan" (by way of marv@lancaironline.net) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Turbocharger Hiflows 12A 13B Series IV & V Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Ed, I think this turbo may not be well suited for aircraft use, either. Just like the stock turbo, this is intended for low altitude applications and will be pushing, if not exceeding it's surge limits when it gets up there where the air is thin. These small diameter automotive units are designed to spin up fast to avoid lag. They are of small diameter to reduce rotational inertia, but that small diameter also means they are going to have to really be humming to manage to compress the air to a desirable ratio at 7Kft+. Those who are thinking of turboing a 13B for aircraft use need to check with somebody who really knows turbos to get the correct unit for the applications we will be facing vs an auto installation. Turbonetics is a good source of this info, but probably not the cheapest, if you know someone who is a turbo guru. BTW, Turbonetics is a US owned company. I went to the turbo forum at Oshkosh this year, which was put on by Kelly Aerospace, who now owns Rayjay, Garret/Airesearch, and Turbonetics. [Mike.... I had to deep six the formatting in your post... couldn't read the bright green text at all. ]