Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #13357
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Reactive vs Absorbtion Mufflers for the Rotary engine
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:46:42 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
One thing I forgot to mention about the muffler design.  It is referred to as a "reactive" type muffler as contrasted to an "absorbtion" type muffler.  From my research it appears that "absorption" type mufflers (packed with fiberglass,steelwool, ceramic wool, etc) appear to be most effective in filtering out exhaust frequencies around 1000Hz and above.  The reactive (sometimes referred to as sound canceling) muffler is more effective at the lower frequencies such as 50-400Hz.
 
Since at 6000 rpm the dominate frequency of the exhaust is the frequency of the exhaust pulse at 200 Hz (combined ports) or 100Hz (separate ports), I decided that the reactive approach would produce better results.
 
  Besides, I had tried the absorption approach earlier using a ceramic wool absorption material.  While it did soften the high frequency metallic sounds of the exhaust, it really did not decrease the overall volume very much.  Besides that - while the ceramic wool survived the heat of the exhaust - the force of the exhaust pulses soon pulverize it into dust.
 
The spintech muffler is in the reactive muffler category.
 
FWIW
 
Ed
 
 
Ed Anderson
Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster