Return-Path: Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 536531 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:27:35 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.66; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([209.215.62.91]) by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20041117212543.LZGV2059.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:25:43 -0500 Message-ID: <419BC1D1.9020900@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:25:37 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: External Fuel Pump ... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Various RV-x drivers that use the O-320-H-series engine have deleted the front mounted mech. pump & gone to 2 elec. pumps (low pressure carburated systems). Charlie Tracy Crook wrote: > The engine driven fuel pump (bolted to a hot air cooled engine) with a > gascolator mounted down where the hottest air exits and near red hot > exhaust pipes (standard aircraft practice) is the dumbest fuel system > layout I can think of. And they wonder why they are so prone to vapor > lock........ > > Two electrics sound like a fine idea to me. > > Tracy > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jim Sower > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:13 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] External Fuel Pump ... > > All, > I'm back. Been away too long. Lots of catching up to do. > > The problem: > My )&$^^$# Lyc IO-360 went south again. Blew a head. Fixed it for > something over $2k. Still have a power loss (down to about 60%) > about > 5-7 min into every flight. After extensive trouble shooting > (checking > everything but fuel pressure which I don't have /yet/) I'm pretty > sure > it's fuel [delivery] related. My 26 psi electric boost pump costs > $600 > at Spruce. The Engine driven pump is $225. I believe they're > both bad. > > I need: > An automotive replacement for the electric boost pump. John Slade > said > IIRC that his pumps set him back about $85 each. I would need to > plumb > a return to the sump tank (or back into the inlet) side of the pump) > through a pressure regulator that I could set at 25-27 psi. > > Does anyone know of a fuel injection rail regulator (or anything > at all > that can be plumbed into an AN-6 system) that can be adjusted down to > regulate at 26 psi? > > Do automotive high pressure fuel pumps allow fuel to pass freely > if they > are turned off? Like, could one plumb two of them in series and use > them one at a time (as that's what would have to be the case if I > were > to retain the engine driven pump)? If so, what might be the pressure > drop across the idle boost pump when the engine driven pump is > carrying > the load and the boost pump is off? > > What are anyone's thoughts around dispensing with the engine > driven pump > and using two electric pumps in parallel? This idea just popped > into my > head as I was writing this, so it's still in the "brain fart" stage. > > Thanks in advance for any and all ideas ... Jim S. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >