Return-Path: Received: from frontend1.cwpanama.net ([201.225.225.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 528540 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:16:33 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend1.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with SMTP id 31365316 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:16:02 -0500 Message-ID: <010301c4c85d$0b79c560$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:12:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0100_01C4C833.225C2D10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C4C833.225C2D10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageHi Paul, sorry for the late answer.... I am answering also t o the next couple of posts that followed this one: a) No Paul I didn't miss the 2 Mustangs - are they on any website? Not = specifically about the EWP, but I also like Mustangs :)) b) Checked up on the TransAm. Seems to be a nice installation, but Al = has a point, I would like to see some fullpower use, like road racing = with road legal cars like the TransAm, to see wether it holds up with = the heat there. c) More convincing is always good! Please be so kind and send me = whatever links you have! My e-mail address is on the way! d) Mark has also a point IF the only means to hold the impeller is that = set screw. I could see it on the TransAm site, but I certainly would = hope there would be a key or spline to transmit the torque to the = impeller. e) On ACRE someone posted a list with WP and EWP makers. Davis Craig gives 2000 hrs on the motor Mezier 2500 hrs (according to the TransAm guy) Stewart EMP Components gives 10000 hrs!!! and up to 55 GPM!! Anyone = using a Stewart on their ride? At least the hrs raise a warning flag = with me! Such numbers are hard to proof or guarantee! The other two are = more reasonable.... Again, if I see that it works I will give it some serious consideration = when "my" time comes! Thomas J. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: paul=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:30 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Hi, Thomas....perhaps you missed my previous post. I know of two = local Mustangs (driven on the street daily) that have been using EWP's = for at least 3 years now. They are very pleased with them. If you don't believe me, check out www.ws6.com/kelley-wp.htm He = installed an EWP in his TransAm and has been driving around in 100 plus = degrees of heat with the air conditioning on high, and loves the pump. = He said the pump obviously will outlast the stock water pump that failed = on him. If you need more convincing, please contact me privately, and I = will direct you to many other internet sites that show satisfied EWP = users in EVERYDAY DRIVING. These pumps ARE being used for everyday = driving, and the numbers are growing. Paul Conner, 13b powered SQ2000 = canard in Mobile, AL ----- Original Message -----=20 From: rijakits=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP With a RV-3 the zoom-zoom should be right on! :)) Agreed on the belts! Though I do stand to be corrected!=20 As I said I want to learn as much as I can. If experience shows you = guys are right with the EWP, by all means I will check it out too! Never = said I refuse to learn - there are just a lot of things that don't make = comon sense to me - which might make perfect sense to everybody else. I = am just hard to convince. Before I consider to put something into the air the first time, I = would like to see some history on it somewhere else - don't see any EWP = on cars yet as a means of regular cooling, except racing. I know they = sell them aftermarket for that too now, but I don't see any longterm = experience yet.... Maybe Dale still thinks I am just big mouthing, ....again I saw my = share of near calls around helicopters for one part. New Design = Tailrotorblades to be more efficient etc. - Until they gave in after a = few hours - the company that produced them doesn't exist anymore - and = they where certified too.... I want to see things work for a good while before I consider using = them in an aircraft.... Thomas Jakits ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:34 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP PS: Rusty, I never caught the plane you built, what are you = flying? RV-3B. Zoom, zoom :-) BTW, as to the belt subject. I think the only thing you and I = will be able to agree on is that you like them more than I do :-) Cheers, Rusty (off to finish the MRI installation from anti-heaven) ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C4C833.225C2D10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late answer....
I am answering also t o the next couple of posts = that followed=20 this one:
a) No Paul I didn't miss the 2 Mustangs - are they = on any=20 website? Not specifically about the EWP, but I also like Mustangs=20 :))
b) Checked up on the TransAm. Seems to be a nice = installation,=20 but Al has a point, I would like to see some fullpower use, like road = racing=20 with road legal cars like the TransAm, to see wether it holds up with = the heat=20 there.
c) More convincing is always good! Please be so kind = and send=20 me whatever links you have! My e-mail address is on the = way!
d) Mark has also a point IF the only means to hold = the=20 impeller is that set screw. I could see it on the TransAm site, but I = certainly=20 would hope there would be a key or spline to transmit the torque=20 to the impeller.
e) On ACRE someone posted a list with WP and EWP=20 makers.
Davis Craig gives 2000 hrs on the motor
Mezier 2500 hrs (according to the TransAm = guy)
Stewart EMP Components gives 10000 hrs!!! and up to = 55 GPM!!=20 Anyone using a Stewart on their ride?    At least the hrs = raise a=20 warning flag with me! Such numbers are hard to proof or guarantee! The = other two=20 are more reasonable....
 
Again, if I see that it works I will give it some = serious=20 consideration when "my" time comes!
 
Thomas J.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 paul=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, = 2004 10:30=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = EWP

Hi, Thomas....perhaps you missed my = previous=20 post.  I know of two local Mustangs (driven on the street daily) = that=20 have been using EWP's for at least 3 years now. They are very pleased = with=20 them.
    If you don't = believe me, check=20 out www.ws6.com/kelley-wp.htm&n= bsp; =20 He installed an EWP in his TransAm and has been driving around in 100 = plus=20 degrees of heat with the air conditioning on high, and loves the = pump. He=20 said the pump obviously will outlast the stock water pump = that=20 failed on him.  If you need more convincing, please contact me = privately,=20 and I will direct you to many other internet sites that = show satisfied=20 EWP users in EVERYDAY DRIVING.   These pumps ARE being used = for=20 everyday driving, and the numbers are growing.  Paul Conner, 13b = powered=20 SQ2000 canard in Mobile, AL
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 rijakits
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, = 2004=20 10:22 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = EWP

With a RV-3 the zoom-zoom should be right on!=20 :))
Agreed on the belts!
Though I do stand to be corrected!
As I said I want to learn as much as I can. If = experience=20 shows you guys are right with the EWP, by all means I will check it = out too!=20 Never said I refuse to learn - there are just a lot of things that = don't=20 make comon sense to me - which might make perfect sense to everybody = else. I=20 am just hard to convince.
Before I consider to put something into the air = the first=20 time, I would like to see some history on it somewhere else - don't = see any=20 EWP on cars yet as a means of regular cooling, except racing. I know = they=20 sell them aftermarket for that too now, but I don't see any longterm = experience yet....
Maybe Dale still thinks I am just big mouthing, = ....again=20 I saw my share of near calls around helicopters for one part. New = Design=20 Tailrotorblades to be more efficient etc.  - Until they gave in = after=20 a few hours - the company that produced them doesn't exist = anymore -=20 and they where certified too....
I want to see things work for a good while = before I=20 consider using them in an aircraft....
 
Thomas Jakits
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Wednesday, November = 10, 2004=20 10:34 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = EWP

PS: Rusty, I never caught the plane you built, = what are=20 you flying?

RV-3B.  Zoom,=20 zoom :-)
 
BTW, as to the=20 belt subject.  I think the only thing you and I will be able = to agree=20 on is that you like them more than I do :-)
 
Cheers,
Rusty (off to=20 finish the MRI installation from anti-heaven)
 
=




<= /HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0100_01C4C833.225C2D10--