Thomas,

   Are you an actual builder?  Or do you just come here to
stir the mud?

   I ask because you are employing tactics that I usually
see reserved for political discussions - to wit, mis- and
re- direction when challenged.

   You said:

>
> From: "rijakits" <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
> Date: 2004/11/08 Mon PM 07:11:35 EST
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP
> ...
>   Somewhere in another post on this newsletter, same thread, someone said that I am wrong concerning the need for a bigger battery wit a EWP.
>   Well you don't need a bigger battery unless you would like to keep your sparetime to engine shutdown the same as without the EWP. You also will need a bigger alternator...about 4 to 7 amps bigger, according to the numbers showing up on the list :)
>

   However, what you had actually written was:

From: "rijakits" <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:13:11 -0500

>> ...
>> Well a bigger battery will need a heavier alternator!

to which I responded.

> Wrong! It isn't the bigger battery that requires a
larger alternator; it is the total system current
requirements.

   I stand by my words.  

Dale R.
COZY MkIV #1254
Ch's 4, 5 and 23 in progress.