Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #12669
From: rijakits <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:10:43 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 12:05 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP

maybe I missed it, but for what reason would you want to run electric waterpumps?
 
- no cavitation at high rpm
- better cooling at low rpm (holding for takeoff, etc)
- more power available for the prop, particularly at higher rpm's (remains to be proven how much more)
- reliability (broken and throw belts are the only thing that's EVER stranded me in a car, happened twice)
- easier, more flexible installation
- redundancy (ever seen two mechanical pumps)
- other advantages I'm too tired to think of at the moment.
 
For the record, I'm pretty happy with my series mechanical and EWP setup.  It's sort of like having the best of both worlds.  The only reason I'll go full EWP is if I can prove that there's significant performance to be gained.  Frankly, I'll be surprised if I can tell any RPM difference between mechanical, and EWP runs.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 
 
 
 
Rusty I don't see, how more cooling flow at low rpm will cool better, there is still no change in radiator-size/airflow/etc.
no cavitation at high rpm: use underdrive pulleys
and maintain the belts in correct alignmentand tension and you will never loose one..........:)
 
Thomas Jakits
(I have abour 5000 hrs flying time in front of belts double-v-typ as the only means of powertransfer from the engine to the rotor....)
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster