Return-Path: Received: from mxsf26.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.226] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.4) with ESMTP id 453565 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:21:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.226; envelope-from=cardmarc@charter.net Received: from mxip09.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139]) by mxsf26.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i95HLQ3N011392 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:21:27 -0400 Received: from fep02.charter.net (HELO 209.225.8.224) (209.225.8.82) by mxip09.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 05 Oct 2004 13:21:27 -0400 Message-Id: <3948sc$98fevr@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.85,124,1094443200"; d="scan'208"; a="310885371:sNHT14517032" X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.12 (webedge20-101-197-20030912) From: To: , Subject: oil facts from a lab............ Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:21:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Blackstone Labs Subject: Oil Analysis newsletter Welcome to Blackstone Laboratories' newsletter... The Oil Report! To see the newsletter, please click here. http://www.blackstone-labs.com/newsletter2.html Not the newsletter type? Perhaps you'd like to: Order free sampling kits or get a discount on your analysis http://www.blackstone-labs.com/free_test_kit.html Learn where silicon comes from http://www.blackstone-labs.com/the_silicon_bugaboo.html Coming soon -- Blackstone's new website! It's not up yet but it will be soon. If you have ideas you'd like to see incorporated into the site, please email them to me. Check our site in the next few weeks so you don't miss the grand unveiling! Kristin Also from Blackstone's website: We have a database of the wear produced from just about all types of aircraft engines. As an experiment, we compared the wear metals produced in a Lycoming IO-360 on four types of oils: Aeroshell W100, Aeroshell 15W/50, Exxon Elite 20W/50, and Phillips 20W/50. The sample group contained 571 IO-360s. Here are the results: Aluminum wear ranged from 68 ppm, or no significant difference. Chrome ranged from 46 ppm, or no significant difference. Copper ran from 59 ppm; again, not much difference. Tin was 1 or 2 ppm for all types. Nickel ran at 2 ppm for all oil types. We found minor variations in iron wear ranging from 23 to 27 ppm. If you had 4 ppm of any of these metals in your eye, you would never know it. But wait! Iron wear tends to increase the longer the oil is in service. So we ran another column on the spreadsheet, dividing iron wear by average hours oil use. Once again, we found no significant difference in iron wear. Our conclusion from this (and other tests we have run using wear data) is, it does not make any difference brand of oil you use in your aircraft engine. There may be a correct grade. There is not a correct brand. There are many variables to consider in how an aircraft engine wears. We consider the oil type to be the least of these variables (if it has any significance at all). Marc Wiese