Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.3) with ESMTP-TLS id 434586 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:49:15 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=steve@tsisp.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:48:42 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil viscosity Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:49:30 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c4a4db$df3b8730$6400a8c0@workgroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4A4BA.582B6DD0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4A4BA.582B6DD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MessageRusty, I've been reading these post with great interest. As luck would have it, I had started out using Mobile1 5W30 oil, and switched to the 15W50 after I decided that the 5W30 was too thin. When I changed oil, I saw a 10 degree increase in oil temperature. I thought for a few minutest hat it was due to the oil, but then discounted it and figured that it was due to something else. I was making allot of changes at that time. Maybe I need to go back to the 5W30. Steve Brooks (getting pretty soggy) -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 7:39 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil viscosity 5W30 seems a bit low. > > I was thinking the same thing. Leon, will an extremely light oil be able to keep the seperation between the bearings and shaft? On the other hand, will it 'wet' the walls of the cooler better and thereby transfer heat more efficiently? Since when it 30 weight oil is "extremely light"? You might call it extremely standard, or extremely normal :-) As I understand it, the first number is the cold rating, which is just for cold starting, so it doesn't have any effect on normal operation. BTW, I made about 3 trips around the airport (on the ground of course), and just made it to 140 degrees. I'm convinced it's cooling much better with the lighter (though not extremely light ) oil. Can't wait to fly it, but next Sunday is the earliest possible opportunity, and probably more like the next weekend. Rusty (Airbike project for sale cheap on eBay now, gotta make room in the garage) ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4A4BA.582B6DD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Rusty,
I've=20 been reading these post with great interest.  As luck would have = it, I had=20 started out using Mobile1 5W30 oil, and switched to the 15W50 after I = decided=20 that the 5W30 was too thin. 
 
When I=20 changed oil, I saw a 10 degree increase in oil temperature.  I = thought for=20 a few minutest hat it was due to the oil, but then discounted it and = figured=20 that it was due to something else.  I was making allot of changes = at that=20 time.
 
Maybe=20 I need to go back to the 5W30.
 
Steve=20 Brooks (getting pretty soggy)
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 7:39 PM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil=20 viscosity

5W30 seems a bit low.
>
>
I was = thinking the=20 same thing.  Leon, will an
extremely light oil be able to keep = the=20 seperation
between the bearings and shaft?  On the other = hand,
will=20 it 'wet' the walls of the cooler better and
thereby transfer heat = more=20 efficiently?

 
Since = when it 30=20 weight oil is "extremely light"?  You might call it = extremely=20 standard, or extremely normal :-)  As I understand it, the first = number=20 is the cold rating, which is just for cold starting, so it doesn't = have any=20 effect on normal operation. 
 
BTW, I = made about 3=20 trips around the airport (on the ground of course), and just made it = to 140=20 degrees.  I'm convinced it's cooling much better with the lighter = (though=20 not extremely light <g>) oil.  Can't wait to fly it, but = next=20 Sunday is the earliest possible opportunity, and probably more like = the next=20 weekend. 
 
Rusty = (Airbike project=20 for sale cheap on eBay now, gotta make room in the = garage)
 



------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4A4BA.582B6DD0--