Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 09:21:38 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2053615 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:37:51 -0500 Received: from mail4.carolina.rr.com (fe4 [24.93.67.51]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h2FFXwgA019639 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:33:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from o7y6b5 ([24.25.85.21]) by mail4.carolina.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:39:22 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c2eb09$c0ea2a80$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Sump Size Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Injection X-Original-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:23:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Injection > Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : > > >The regulator controls the pressure in the entire > fuel > > rail system, not just the point it is hooked to. It regulates by bleeding > > off enough fuel to reduce system pressure to the desired point. > > Hi, Tracy....thank you for that detailed explanation. The light finally > came on, and I understand it now. Unfortunately, I have only had carburetors > in the past, and the EFI is all new to me. One last question came to mind > as I was imagining the fuel returning to the sump tank. Is it normally a > large volume of fuel that returns to the tank, or just a trickle. I ask > that because I need to consider how large of a sump tank to incorporate into > my fuselage. Thanks again, Tracy. Paul Conner > Hi Paul, Here is my perspective on size of your sump tank. I used a quart size sump tank mounting on my firewall to return my unused fuel from the pressure regulator. It has worked fine for me, however, I would recommend: 1. As large a size as feasible and not smaller than one gallon (larger gives you more of a heat sink) 2. That the Sump tank be located outside the engine compartment or if not, at least, make certain it has lots of cooling air (blast tube). 3. Also, I would make certain I had a boost pump to put pressure in the sump should it start to show signs of the fuel becoming heated (percolating, fluctuation fuel pressure, etc.), probably with a larger sump this would not be necessary. 4.Also, the feed from the sump to the EFI pumps should be such that the pumps have fuel at their inlets at you minimum fuel conditions (in other words the pumps should be as low as possible or slightly higher than a gasolator (if you use one to trap water)) as pumps like to push fuel not suck it {:>). Since the returned fuel has been heated by its passage through the fuel system, the fuel in the sump pump will accumulate this heated fuel and on a hot day (with my small quart size sump mounted on the firewall) I can see indications of it wanting to percolate. Turning on my boost pump precludes that from happening, but with a larger sump tank located elsewhere, there probably would not be any tendency to do that. Even though my setup works fine for me, returning fuel to the main tanks is of course the most desirable route if feasible. If not - a sump will work, just need to be carefully thought out. Ed Anderson