Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:57:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pescado.nosc.mil ([128.49.4.90] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1794278 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:02:08 -0400 Received: from WILLSM (willsm-pc.spawar.navy.mil [128.49.207.112]) by pescado.nosc.mil (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id H39B2Z00.7IH for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:01:47 -0700 X-Original-Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020930080659.014135b8@mailsd1.spawar.navy.mil> X-Sender: willsm@mailsd1.spawar.navy.mil X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:15:38 -0700 X-Original-To: From: "Mike Wills" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] water pumps In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed John, I'm with Ed. The electric water pump may work in a low duty cycle application, but not in a high duty cycle application like an aircraft engine. Trying to cool a high power, high duty cyle application with an electric pump and expecting to gain power in the process sounds an awful lot like a perpetual motion machine to me. I've read Hot Rod for 30 years and have always enjoyed it. But if I applied all of the tricks like this that I've read about over the years, I'd be able to build a 1000HP small block Chevy using only bolt on parts (sold by Hot Rod advertisers) for less than $2000. :-) Mike Wills At 02:47 PM 9/29/2002 -0400, you wrote: >There is an article in hot rod mag this month that says an electric water >pump has made gains of 40 hp, it states that it takes less power to run an >alternator than a pump and units can be fabricated from universal units from >hot rod supply houses. JohnD