Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 367694 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:26:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from nc.rr.com (cpe-024-211-191-066.nc.rr.com [24.211.191.66]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i7H2QLPf014378 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <412166DE.9090601@nc.rr.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:01:02 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: motor mount bushings Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine I finally got a mount design that I'm happy with. All the numbers seem to be in order. So then I grab my Spruce catalogue to investigate mount bushings. Two pages of bushings and not a single radius listed anywhere. It's my understanding the the conical mounts do a better job of isolating vibration, and I can machine sockets for them. I just need to know what size. Does anyone have one or two that they can lay a set of calipers on? -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber