Return-Path: Received: from mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 343548 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:28:44 -0400 Received-SPF: error receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.207; envelope-from=cardmarc@charter.net Received: from mxip11.cluster1.charter.net (mxip11a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.141]) by mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i72NSD5j003553 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:28:14 -0400 Received: from 68.112.57.8.ts46v-02.dntn.tx.charter.com (HELO office) (68.112.57.8) by mxip11.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2004 19:28:13 -0400 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,100,1089000000"; d="scan'208"; a="169514017:sNHT16659314" From: "marc" To: , "ACRE NL" , "Flyrotary" Subject: FW: RE: bsfc? Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:27:52 -0500 Message-ID: <000a01c478e8$565e6870$6502a8c0@office> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Gami's reply to my question. 300hp! > ____________________Forward Header_____________________ > Subject: RE: bsfc? > Author: "George Braly" > Date: 8/2/2004 10:58 AM > > Marc, > > >> 17 hours of turbo-normalized operations in the last three days - all > lean of peak TIT. Altitudes from 3000 MSL to 18,000 and everywhere in > between. ADH to ORL to PNE to ADH (55Kt headwind) ... headwinds on two > of three legs. Average power? 92.5% of rated 300 HP continuous in > cruise. > Average torque? ~ 102% of rated torque; hottest CHT = ~ 378; TIT =~ 1505 > to 1525F; and normal BSFC = ~ 0.385 lbs/hp/hr.<< > > That is the correct quote (note, 300 Hp, not 200). I made the flight > back in May. The cylinders on that engine have been operated that way > now for about 1400 hours. > > The BSFC of 0.385 is the normal BSFC for that engine when operating at > high power and 50 to 80F LOP, which is where the observed BSFC(min) for > that engine happens on a high power mixture sweep. > > 0.385 is pretty standard for a high compression (8.5:1) big bore TCM > engine, according to TCM's own published data which we have confirmed on > our test stand. > > And, yes, 0.385 is very good, and most people do not appreciate how > excellent our aircraft engines are in this regard when properly operated > at high power while lean of peak. For example, the Porsche Mooney > (geared) engine would only do about 0.42 to 0.425, even when LOP. In > that case, the overall smaller size of the engine, the higher RPM, and > the gear box are what makes the difference. > > Regards, George >